BERLIN WORKSHOP ON SPEECH AND HARM
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
BERLIN WORKSHOP ON SPEECH AND HARM
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023

Co-Sponsored by Workshop on Gender and Philosophy Berlin

(WOGAP BERLIN)

Berlin Workshop on Speech and Harm

This workshop aims to bring together researchers working on speech and harm from a wide range of career stages, disciplines, and intellectual traditions.


Free and open to all, but please register below! 

Register Now

Schedule :: 27 July, 2023

Location: Technische Universität Berlin

H2038 Main Building

Straße dess 17. Juni 135

10623 Berlin, DE

Format

Each session will have 30 minutes for presentation, and 20 minutes for discussion.

9:45–10:00 Coffee & Welcome

10:10–11:00: W. Starr (Cornell), "Social Norms and Conversational Injustice"

Our conversations contain moves that reflect and create deep inequities. What general mechanisms are responsible for this, and what does this mean for practical efforts to make our conversations more just? This talk proposes a central role for social norms in conversation, and explores how this can shed light on these questions. 

Chair: Quill Kukla

11:10–12:00: Nikki Ernst (Pittsburgh), “The Desolation of Philosophy”

To so-called ‘non-ideal’ philosophers of language, our messy whirl of political discourse calls for a critical reassessment of methodology. Alas, the movement’s ideology-critical bite is neutralized by a commitment to normative neutrality, an illusion of philosophical authority, and a desolate picture of language as divorced from the activities into which it is woven.
Chair: Quill Kukla

12:00–13:30: Lunch

Reservation for presenters @ Cafe Hardenberg (Hardenbergstraße 10, 10623 Berlin)

13:30–14:20: Quill Kukla (Georgetown), "The Ethics of Retraction"

Using speech act theory, I explore the nature and ethics of retraction. We are fundamentally imperfect beings who make mistakes, as any ethics usable in the actual world needs to acknowledge. Because we make mistakes, repair is an essential category of ethical action. Retraction has many uses, and not all of them are reparative. But, I will argue, retraction is a central tool of repair. We use retraction to repair ourselves, and to repair the social world, including our relationships. I begin by offering a pragmatic analysis of retraction and its success conditions. I then ask: When is retraction possible; when is it ethically permissible; and, finally, when is it ethically advisable or obligatory, as part of a project of repair.

Chair: W. Starr

14:30–15:20: Elin McCready (Aoyama Gakuin), "On Ideological Arguments"

It’s hard to have a rational argument when things get ideological. This is a problem because ideology and signaling social identity more generally plays a prominent role in much discourse about politics and social issues. This talk gives a diagnosis of why these kinds of conversations so often go bad — an entrance to a hypervigilant mode of interpretation which comes with a highly irrational mode of evaluation — and offers a possible method of addressing the issue involving appeals to other modes of affect production. 

Chair: W. Starr

15:20–15:50: Coffee Break

15:50–16:40: Penelope Freund (TU Berlin), "Persuasive Speech — When Hate Speech is Most Dangerous"

Hate speech is harmful, this much is evident in numerous arguments made in the philosophical debate. It can incite violence, degrade people who have been historically marginalized, and even silence them. However, two assumptions of many of these arguments are 1) that hate speech is a uniform phenomenon and 2) that hate speech can persuade people of their messages and by that means effect violence, degradation, or silencing. In my talk, I want to counter the first assumption and suggest a philosophical explanation for the second one. 

Chair: W. Starr

16:50–17:40: Cassie Herbert (Illinois St.), "Very Online Misogyny"

I explore practices of online misogyny and harassment, such as sealioning, couching, and receipt denial. Unlike harassment that contains hate speech or slurs, these forms of harassment take place at the pragmatic level and the harm they inflict can be difficult to call out. I highlight the unique dimensions of online speech that enable these forms of harassment and make them particularly powerful and insidious. 

Chair: W. Starr

17:40–18:00: Adriene Takaoka (Cornell): Concluding Discussion

Concluding discussion among participants, facilitated by Adriene Takaoka. 

About

Who

What

What

This workshop is organized by Quill Kukla (Georgetown University), Elin McCready (Aoyama Gakuin University), and W. Starr (Cornell University), in collaboration with Axel Gelfert, and hosted by Institut für Philosophie, Literatur-, Wissenschafts- und Technikgeschichte, Technische Universität Berlin. 

What

What

What

This workshop aims to bring together researchers working on speech and harm from a wide range of career stages, disciplines, and intellectual traditions.

When

Where

Where

27 July 2023, from 10:00–18:00. See schedule for additional details.

Where

Where

Where

The workshop is hosted by Institut für Philosophie, Literatur-, Wissenschafts- und Technikgeschichte, Technische Universität Berlin, and will be held in H2038 Main Building, Straße dess 17. Juni 135

10623 Berlin, DE.

Workshop Flyer

Download

Slides for Download

Starr-Slides (pdf)

Download

Contact organizers

Send Message

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Do you have questions or comments about the event? Do you need accommodations? Send us a message, and we will get back to you as soon as we can.

Berlin Workshop on Speech and Harm

Copyright © 2025 Berlin Workshop on Speech and Harm - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by